<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sincerity Crucial to Ads, PR, and Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/</link>
	<description>Where Mind Meets Message</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:12:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/comment-page-1/#comment-506</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commcognition.com/blog/?p=76#comment-506</guid>
		<description>I was going to write what Tim wrote, &quot;I agree  You’re brilliant.&quot;

I see and read my fill of online content and I do include remarks on some blogs and it is sometimes nothing more than a &quot;that a boy&quot;. I agree it is not an engaging lead in to a real conversation but it is feedback and is a readers quickest way to say &quot;Thanks for your effort.&quot;  Isn&#039;t better than to just be a nameless hit on an analytics program? Doesn&#039;t a blogger enjoy a little feedback? If every blog post attracted 40 engaging comments, would this be a blessing or a headache for the blogger if the readers are expecting answers, feedback and engaging commentary?  It is without a doubt the problem a blogger wants to have.  

I think your point is not about too many great comments, but rather to not spread comment spam and smear your brand. Did I mention that  I agree. You&#039;re brilliant :-) But, if I like a blog, I see nothing brand smearing about a short comment saying, Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to write what Tim wrote, &#8220;I agree  You’re brilliant.&#8221;</p>
<p>I see and read my fill of online content and I do include remarks on some blogs and it is sometimes nothing more than a &#8220;that a boy&#8221;. I agree it is not an engaging lead in to a real conversation but it is feedback and is a readers quickest way to say &#8220;Thanks for your effort.&#8221;  Isn&#8217;t better than to just be a nameless hit on an analytics program? Doesn&#8217;t a blogger enjoy a little feedback? If every blog post attracted 40 engaging comments, would this be a blessing or a headache for the blogger if the readers are expecting answers, feedback and engaging commentary?  It is without a doubt the problem a blogger wants to have.  </p>
<p>I think your point is not about too many great comments, but rather to not spread comment spam and smear your brand. Did I mention that  I agree. You&#8217;re brilliant <img src='http://www.commcognition.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  But, if I like a blog, I see nothing brand smearing about a short comment saying, Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel D. Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel D. Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commcognition.com/blog/?p=76#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Glad my close friends are still witty as every.

And glad to see you online Watty! Hope Sacramento is treating you well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad my close friends are still witty as every.</p>
<p>And glad to see you online Watty! Hope Sacramento is treating you well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commcognition.com/blog/?p=76#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Tim L. stole my thunder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim L. stole my thunder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Faith Essary</title>
		<link>http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Faith Essary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 17:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commcognition.com/blog/?p=76#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Great post Sam.  I&#039;m glad I stumbled across your work, I&#039;ve enjoyed reading your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Sam.  I&#8217;m glad I stumbled across your work, I&#8217;ve enjoyed reading your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Laubacher</title>
		<link>http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Laubacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commcognition.com/blog/?p=76#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I agree. You&#039;re brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. You&#8217;re brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel D. Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.commcognition.com/blog/sincerity-social-medi/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel D. Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.commcognition.com/blog/?p=76#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Kimberlee. I appreciate the comment.

And I went back and added a sentence. Upon rereading it, that &quot;news&quot; line could have come across the wrong way. I hope I cleared that up.

It is simply &lt;em&gt;amazing&lt;/em&gt; how much traffic I get on Twitter about lists of how to drive more traffic.

And so few of them are right-minded the way that you are.

Meaningful relationships.
Meaningful content.

How can that go wrong?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Kimberlee. I appreciate the comment.</p>
<p>And I went back and added a sentence. Upon rereading it, that &#8220;news&#8221; line could have come across the wrong way. I hope I cleared that up.</p>
<p>It is simply <em>amazing</em> how much traffic I get on Twitter about lists of how to drive more traffic.</p>
<p>And so few of them are right-minded the way that you are.</p>
<p>Meaningful relationships.<br />
Meaningful content.</p>
<p>How can that go wrong?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

