I began my career as the education and health care reporter for the Las Cruces Sun-News, and I got to work with some amazing people.

Back in the day, I’m not sure whether I ever noticed this neon sign above the former Safeway store in which we worked.

I’ll be there to cover the social media angle, including how officials there use their @valermoalamobowl Twitter account.

As a journalist, I covered Division I athletics for the New Mexico State student paper, a now defunct regional sports monthly, the Las Cruces Sun-News, and even as a stringer for Sports Illustrated (sadly the latter stuff never was published).

But I never covered a bowl game.

So I’m excited about this opportunity. There are a lot of interesting media professionals in San Antonio skilled in social media, and I’ll be attempting to check in on them there and report back here.

Stay tuned.

When I say “nothing,” I mean nothing. Renovations nearly shuttered the student union building that summer, and all Round Up possessions (save a desk or two) sat somewhere in university storage.

The first-ever media advisor was yet to be hired, and the staff business manager had been let go as that position shifted to two student workers.

I did have a budget for the year. And that budget called for an online editor.

I’m not sure that I knew exactly what that meant. At home, we had CompuServe a couple of years earlier, and I had e-mailed the two people I knew with e-mail addresses. I also played around with those weird things like Archie and Gopher. But I certainly had never done anything akin to what would be called “surfing” today.

When the newly constructed media wing opened, we had network connections built it. I vividly remember sitting in my office the day that the network techs brought that first Ethernet cable and installed some early version of Netscape.

We were captivated, entering www dot anything-we-could-think-of dot com.

What we didn’t find were any student newspapers online. Certainly there were none in New Mexico.  Memory suggests that my future employer, the Albuquerque Journal, wasn’t even online yet.

We posted an ad with student employment services, and amazingly we got a couple of applications. It’s hard to imagine having that much foresight as to be qualified to be an online editor in 1995, but there were some.

We ended up hiring Jerome Parks, an engineering major. Not surprisingly, there were no qualified journalism students.

Jerry coded a relatively simple set of pages with our “flag,” and a unique page for each story. The home page linked to each issue. There was this light brown paper looking background with little round red gif buttons for each link. Sadly I don’t have the exact date that we went live, but it was during the fall semester, as Jerry was teaching me to code my own HTML pages at this time 13 years ago.

I thought of this recently as I ran across @nicklongo on Twitter. He was a real Internet pioneer, and he clearly saw far more potential than we ever did (check out his bio here).

It’s funny looking backward as the newspaper business model currently crashes around the industry.

I’m not sure what we saw of the future. But it wasn’t this.

We were just happy to get Letters to the Editor via e-mail so we didn’t have to retype them.

We struggled then with the idea of online ads, and I’m not sure whether we ever sold any during those first 18 months.

But the online edition was a novelty. I suppose that’s the difference between a dot com visionary and the rest of us.

The Internet caught up quickly. Just two years after I took over the paper, I really wanted to go work for ABCNews.com in New York City. But I had already accepted a position with the Dow Jones Newspaper Fund summer editing internship program, and that propelled my brief career in print journalism.

Looking back, it’s difficult to capture the sense of really having been a pioneer  — albeit a pioneer without much vision. To my knowledge, we were the first online newspaper in the state.

It’s just a strange feeling to have been a part of something without having really known it.

We had no analytics, and I have no idea what the traffic was. But it was fun to be an early adopter. I just wish that I had a better feel at the time for what we were adopting.

This lack of training is little problem for people sharing recipes or documenting the first days of their newborn child. However, many bloggers aspire to make a living at the craft, and financial independence is extremely unlikely for untrained hacks.

The print newspaper is dying a rather fast death, but formal journalism training benefits storytellers. With that said, here are five news tips for Bloggers:

1. Don’t bury the lead

If you pick up the newspaper or call up the New York Times online, you will notice that few stories are told chronologically. That’s because boring stuff usually happens at the beginning. Journalists get to the point. What makes this post interesting? Get that up front, or your readers will move on. In traditional news writing, the first paragraph is called the lead (often spelled “lede” to differential it from the hot liquid metal, lead, from which papers were originally printed).

And good leads contain the most important information.

Embarrassingly, burying the lead came to mind because I got called on it last week by a friend and fellow journalist. D’oh. How could I have been so careless?

2. Write compelling headlines

Clever, well-written headlines draw readers into the story. This was true on newsprint 100 years ago, and it’s true today. Every word counts. Take the time present the most important facts compellingly.

A good headline cannot save a bad post, but a bad headline can prevent a good post from ever being read.

When I worked the copy desk at the Albuquerque Journal, I viewed every headline as a contest — a contest that I wanted to win. Every day I wanted to hear a colleague say, “great headline.”

Most people think that reporters write headlines. They don’t. At best they suggest headlines, but in my experience they don’t even do that. Headlines are written by copy editors, who know the font size and the number of columns that the headline needed to cover. And they have lots of practice at writing good headlines.

Blogs usually have a single-deck headline of a fixed length. Although this is limiting, it is not an excuse for lazy writing (more advice I need to remember, too).

Bottom line: Never, ever write the headline first. The best headlines are written at 10 p.m. when the reporter has been home for four hours. And they are never written before the story.

3. Make every word count

One of the biggest blog problems is excessive prose. Even when newsprint was cheap, there was a fixed newshole. And when it was filled, you stopped. This blog post can stretch to infinity. That’s not an advantage.

As an analogy, consider what a former friend used to say to robust women with bare midriffs.

“Just because they make that in a size 13, honey, doesn’t mean you should wear it.”

Likewise, don’t writer every word that comes to mind because you can.

Try to write tight. Sure there’s endless space, but extra words are bad. You’re probably blogging during spare time, and you don’t have a rim and slot editor to trim fat. Be concise anyway.

4. Add color to your stories

I’m not a gifted writer. On my good days, I am a trained writer who tries hard. When I see a writer use powerful, concrete language, I am moved.

You can feel it when just the right detail is added to a story. What is the single aspect of a person or a situation that is crucial to the reader’s understanding? Find it. Write it.

Remember that a picture is worth, more or less, 1,000 words. Only you can see what you’re trying to say. Fight for exactly the right words to convey that scene to the reader.

5. Avoid adjectives

Excessive adjectives are the comforting crutch of the lazy writer. Sure, even well-trained, dedicated need some colorful descriptive adjectives. But if you’re using a lot of them, then you have simply failed to find the right nouns and verbs (hopefully the humor is not lost in this paragraph).

Mark Twain is reported to have said, “When you can catch an adjective, kill it.”

Did you really need to say, “violent explosion”?

This would supposedly differentiate it from a peaceful explosion.

We may talk of “future plans,” but there’s one adjective too many in that sentence. Unless your time machine surpasses mine, future plans are the only plans.

Catch them and kill them.

So, tell me. What is the sixth blog improving tip that I should have included?

Share your thoughts in the comments.

Learning good writing is not like learning to ride a bicycle (more on clichés another day). Good habits are forgotten. And writing well takes time. Take the time. Your readers will thank you for the investment.

The Round Up is/was/will forever be the best job that I ever had.

When I left NMSU with diploma-in-hand in 1997, I was as “print” as you could be. Man, did I love newspapering.

Read about how cult members become completely devoted to their cause, and that is how I felt about the institution of the daily newspaper.

It was my calling.

Veteran newsman Mack Lundstrom only intensified that love during my Dow Jones Newspaper Fund internship boot camp at San José State that summer. If you ever wanted to love a newspaper, just spend a few hours talking to Mack. He’s still my hero.

Many fluke events led me away from the daily newspaper, but I have missed it nearly every day. And it has been especially sad to watch the industry die as the business model implodes.

But I have to admit that I wasn’t ready for what I saw today on Twitter, posted by @MarketingProfs:

Detroit newspapers quit print home delivery: http://tinyurl.com/5k4vxj

What? How is that even possible? What? OK, maybe in 2018, but 2008? Twenty-bleeping-oh-eight?

It read like a headline from the Onion. But it was painful nonfiction.

According to the Wall Street Journal story:

The Free Press and the News would be the first dailies in a major metropolitan market to curtail home delivery and drastically scale back their print editions. Other newspapers are contemplating similar moves in response to the erosion of advertising and the rising costs of printing and delivery. In October the Christian Science Monitor said it will stop printing a daily newspaper in April and move instead to an online version with a weekly print product.

Insane. Just insane.

I get it — and I’m even part of the problem with this blog, my Facebook and Twitter pages (follow me on Twitter). And I subscribe to the Lubbock Avalanche-Journal only on Sundays. But I just cannot explain the gravitas with which this hits me.

Being in my mid-30’s makes me feel antiquated and irrelevant, but this makes me feel as if I have one foot in the grave.

No home delivery — even on most days — is a white flag of irreversible consequence.

Internet, I love you. But you took just 14 years to deliver a coup de grâce to my first love. And for that I can never forgive you.

Say it ain’t so.

I got the inspiration from Bob Schaller, who writes a number of “20 questions” features. Since Bob writes much faster than me, I decided to stick to 5. I also found it appropriate for him to be the first featured individual.

Bob Schaller is an accomplished author, educator, and journalist. He has published more than 35 books, including a recent biography on Olympic swimming sensation Michael Phelps titled, Michael Phelps: The Untold Story of a Champion (available at Amazon.com, $6.29). He is a staff writer for SwimNetwork.com. Currently a doctoral student in mass communications at Texas Tech, Schaller has worked at newspapers in Nebraska, Colorado and California. He also writes for Splash Magazine, published by USA Swimming.

1) What’s the most important characteristic for a writer?

Schaller: To respond to criticism well, to apply it, and always get better. The best experiences I have had always involve editors who take me out to the proverbial woodshed. My talent is marginal, but my work ethic is exceptional. I like that feedback because it makes me better. Also, write across different genres, not just one or two. If you want to make a living at it, that’s essential, and it’s also a great way to get better. There’s a narrative arc even to explicating a technical writing project like explaining a digital camera. Though that’s different from a biography, it involves a lot of the same critical-thinking and writing skills. Passion is awesome, and people should have that in whatever they do. But a lot of people who love to write simply aren’t that good at it. It’s tough, because writing is so personal — we can all do it at the basic level. But to do it professionally is a whole new skill set. Hey, I can hit a running 12-footer, maybe even more often than Kobe, but the Lakers haven’t called. Still.

2) You’ve taught print journalism and are writing a text on online communication. What must journalism students know today that wasn’t taught 10 years ago?

Schaller: There has been a move away from teaching — in my brief experience — storytelling skills. The new media present new challenges, and they require different skill sets to tell a story well across media. There are some basic components to journalism and storytelling that ring true across media — get it right, be clear and concise, etc. — but doing it on video, print, or audio are different skill sets. It’d be hard to be good in all three, but it shouldn’t come at the expense of developing and honing one’s skills. Being a jack of all trades and master of none means a small market, or limited opportunities. Or at least get good at one before moving onto the others. I like the idea of the multi-media journalist, but a lot more thought, planning and better learning outcomes are going to have to be developed before the new media journalist is part of the working world — and curriculum. A big part of that is a lot of the good folks in academia left the “real world” before the Internet. It’d be hard for anyone to teach something they never experienced. The real-time news cycle is a foreign term to those who left the field before they had the pressure of which story to post, or hold, and when to update a Web site, how the news cycle changes fact checking and editing. Knowing how to use the bells and whistles on this new engine is awesome, but not if you are spinning your wheels. Everyone can produce media — that’s awesome — but not everyone wants to read or hear what EVERYONE else to say. That was the big myth with the citizen journalist, that anyone would care about what others have to say. All the “interactivity” is nasty comments appended at the end of story and below YouTube videos. People want to express themselves — cool — but a rant or vulgar diatribe is not a form of journalism whatsoever. Now, if they have rhetoric skills, it’s a different conversation — speaking of which, those should be taught, too.

3) What do you wish that more freelance writers knew?

Schaller: That you are a contractor as much as a writer. You’d better market yourself if you are going to put food on the table. You can’t believe in writer’s block and be a real writer. Sometimes the words find you, but sometimes you have to find them — I have repeated that several times teaching, because it’s a craft. Someone goes out in the real world and Joe’s PR Firm needs a release written by 5 p.m., and you say, “I can’t do it, writer’s block.” Goodbye. Next.

Being a freelance writer is a great life, a life of dreams. But your name is your brand, so you’d better attach it to projects you are committed to do, and do well. Also, there’s this myth about freelancing that you have no boss. Anyone who signs a paycheck to you is your boss, and if you make them mad once, you run the risk of never writing for that Web site or magazine again — worse, it might extend to ALL the editors in that person’s network, because we all know that word travels fast in these times. Also, don’t ever miss a deadline. I try to “comically” beat deadlines — to get the assignment done well and turned in as quickly as possible, so fast that the editor laughs because she or he “can’t believe how fast” I turned it in. Because when they need something under the gun in the future, they will remember you for that. And usually, with we-need-this-fast assignments, the pay is correspondingly higher because of the urgency.

4) You have amazing networking skills. What is the biggest mistake that recent graduates make in networking?

Schaller: Thinking people owe them something. I tried to help someone here, and they were so mad they didn’t have an answer that week, that person stopped talking to me even when we passed in the hall. Think I will help that person again? Not likely. Also, remember that everything you do is an opportunity to network. Even if you are working for a poverty-level wage at a nonprofit (which is awesome, that’s just not me), you are going to deal with big companies. Make connections, send a thank you — send a resume and work sample. No is going to move you up unless you move yourself up. A lot of people love filling out applications online, and that’s cool if it is asked for, but that’s just getting you in line — I want my students and friends at the front of the line so they get a shot, and what happens from there is up to them. Another important thing is that people think the opportunities are endless. They are, but if you get an interview, don’t give it anything other than your best. You have a million arrows in your sheaf, but you only get one shot at most targets. Miss once, and that often is it. Also, don’t ever react to a perceived (or even real) disrespect if there’s a networking opportunity. Sometimes, people don’t mean what they say, or they are having a bad day and take it out on you — they’ll remember the person who took the high road for all the right reasons, and you might get a job, and an apology, down the road. If you react, you just got to feel good for a second, and doors have closed. I’d rather chug a gallon of pride than throw away a five-figure freelance gig over ego.

5) If someone were to write a biography on Bob Schaller, what should the title be?

Schaller: Dumb luck uncovered: How do these things happen?

Thanks, Bob!